๐ Module Progress
๐ฏ Learning Objectives
๐ Theory
1. Reactive Agents
What: Respond to current input only, no memory of past interactions.
Example: Simple chatbot that answers FAQs.
Pros: Fast, simple, low resource usage.
Cons: Can't learn, can't handle complex tasks.
2. Deliberative Agents
What: Plan ahead, have memory, can reason.
Example: OpenClaw with memory enabled.
Pros: Handle complex tasks, learn from experience.
Cons: Slower, more resource-intensive.
3. Hybrid Agents
What: Combine reactive (fast responses) + deliberative (complex tasks).
Example: JiXe โ quick chat + deep research when needed.
Pros: Best of both worlds.
Cons: More complex to build.
4. Single-Agent Systems
What: One agent handles everything.
Example: Basic OpenClaw setup (just JiXe).
Use case: Personal assistant for one user.
5. Multi-Agent Systems
What: Multiple specialized agents collaborate.
Example: Hermes (orchestrator) + JiXe + Kodi + Mark + Rei.
Use case: Complex projects requiring different expertise.
Benefit: Parallel processing, specialization.
Agent Types Comparison
| Type | Memory | Planning | Speed | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reactive | โ | โ | โกโกโก | Simple FAQs |
| Deliberative | โ | โ | โก | Complex tasks |
| Hybrid | โ | โ | โกโก | All-around use |
| Multi-Agent | โ | โ โ | โกโก | Big projects |
๐ก Real-World Example: JiXe Ecosystem
Single-Agent Mode (Basic)
โผ
User: "What's the weather in Ipoh?"
JiXe: Calls weather API โ returns result
Simple, fast, one agent does everything
Multi-Agent Mode (Advanced)
โผ
User: "Build me a full Criticalyx AI course website."
Hermes (orchestrator):
- Spawns REI โ Research competitor courses
- Spawns MARK โ Write marketing copy
- Spawns KODI โ Code the website
- Spawns DEX โ Analyze user engagement data
Parallel processing, each agent specialized